Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine ; 205(1), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1927840

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is well described as an etiology to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, rare immunologic and allergic manifestations may also occur from this infection. We report a novel case of angioedema occurring in the setting of COVID-19 infection in a fully vaccinated patient. Case Report: A 61-yearold COVID-19 vaccinated female with hypertension presented to the emergency department with tongue and lip swelling, odynophagia, dysphonia, and difficulty breathing. She denied personal or family history of allergies, anaphylaxis, or angioedema. Her home medications included Aspirin, methadone, Seroquel, and Klonopin, with no recent changes reported. Physical exam was notable for significant lip and tongue edema, audible dysphonia, and bilateral end-inspiratory wheezing. She was hypoxemic and placed on nasal cannula. Laboratory findings revealed lymphopenia, elevated inflammatory proteins, including C-reactive protein (57), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (238), and D-dimer (11.52). Functional C1 esterase inhibitor levels (>91) were normal. Nasal PCR swab returned positive for SARS-CoV-2. Ear, nose, and throat specialist was consulted given concern for angioedema, and flexible nasolaryngoscopy was performed revealing uvular, epiglottic, and bilateral arytenoid edema concerning for impending airway compromise. The patient was initiated on intravenous methylprednisolone, epinephrine, antihistamines, tranexamic acid and admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU). She was monitored closely in the ICU with subsequent improvement of the angioedema and resolution of the hypoxemia. She was discharged with an oral steroid regimen and scheduled for a follow-up appointment with an allergist. Discussion: There exists only a handful of case reports describing angioedema in patients with COVID-19 infection. In those reports, patients also had normal C1 esterase inhibitor levels and no personal or family history of inherited angioedema. Interestingly, our patient was vaccinated six months prior to her presentation. The association between SARS-CoV-2 and angiotensinconverting enzyme 2 (ACE-2), the primary receptor for viral entry into the epithelial cells of the lungs, could be a potential explanation for the occurrence of angioedema. ACE-2 plays a pivotal role in inhibiting a potent ligand of bradykinin receptor 1, Arginine bradykinin. It has been postulated that SARS-CoV-2 downregulation of ACE-2 leads to elevated angiotensin II levels and subsequent activation of the bradykinin pathway. Excessive bradykinin production generates high levels of nitric oxide and prostaglandins, resulting in vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, and angioedema. This case highlights the importance of recognizing atypical and rare presentations of COVID-19 infection, especially angioedema, given its sudden onset and life-threatening complications.

2.
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect ; 11(1): 33-35, 2021 Jan 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1054215

ABSTRACT

A 44-year-old COVID-19 positive patient was transferred to our hospital with worsening acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. She was admitted to ICU and was started on high flow oxygen. Her CXR showed worsening bilateral infiltrates. In order to prevent her progression from severe to critical disease, we adopted a multiple modality treatment approach, utilizing clinical judgment and most recent publications. She was treated with antibiotics, convalescent plasma, steroids, hydroxychloroquine and self-proning. After 43 hours, her CXR showed rapid clearing of infiltrates and we could discharge her on day three of hospitalization. Previously reported case series on convalescent plasma showed the number of days taken for significant improvement in chest x-ray varied from 4 to 7 days. The rapidity of improvement in this patient is remarkable and could be due to the multiple modality treatment approach.

3.
medrxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.10.28.20221200

ABSTRACT

Background: Covid-19 curve can be flattened by adopting mass screening protocols with aggressive testing and isolating infected populations. The current approach largely depends on RT-PCR/rapid antigen tests that require expert personnel resulting in higher costs and reduced testing frequency. Loss of smell is reported as a major symptom of Covid-19, however, a precise olfactory testing tool to identify Covid-19 patient is still lacking. Methods: To quantitatively check for the loss of smell, we developed an odor strip, COVID-Anosmia checker, spotted with gradients of coffee and lemon grass oil. We validated its efficiency in healthy and COVID-19 positive subjects. A trial screening to identify SARS-CoV-2 infected persons was also carried out to check the sensitivity and specificity of our screening tool. Results: It was observed that COVID positive participants were hyposmic instead of being anosmic when they were subjected to smelling higher odor concentration. Our tool identified 97% of symptomatic and 94% of asymptomatic COVID-19 positive subjects after excluding most confounding factors like concurrent chronic sinusitis. Further, it was possible to reliably predict COVID-19 infection by calculating a loss of smell score with 100% specificity. We coupled this tool with a mobile application, which takes the input response from the user, and can readily categorize the user in the appropriate risk groups. Conclusion: Loss of smell can be used as a reliable marker for screening for Covid-19. Our tool can rapidly quantitate anosmia, hyposmia, parosmia, and can be used as a first-line screening tool to trace out Covid-19 infection effectively.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sinusitis , Olfaction Disorders , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL